The (Un-)eventful: a Transdisciplinary Journey

We hereby inform you of the upcoming release of our latest publication:
The (Un-)eventful: a Transdisciplinary Journey
Edited by Paul Kaletsch & quintus immisch

Contributors:
Taylor Borowetz, D. M. Braid, Arnaud Miranda, Quintus Immisch, Mrunmayee Sathye, Paul Kaletsch, Saskia Schomber, Felix Berenskötter, Levi McLaughlin, daniela Sonnabend, windpark books (felix hofmann-wissner)

Although the ebook version features the same content (you can find it here), the layout and design of the print edition differs, as it contains unique artistic interventions by Daniela Sonnabend.

The volume brings together various methods and different approaches to events. In this sense, the edited volume does not offer a comprehensive study of ‘important’ empirical events, theoretical conceptualizations of the event, or of different literary forms of narrating event(s). Instead, this book gathers contributions that allow events to unfold in writing practices. The edited volume serves as a laboratory that permits contributors to experiment with not yet fully fledged ideas, risking uncertain outcomes, and encouraging authors both to do what they want to do and to explore how they want to do it. Therefore, the chapters work as sketches that are meant to intrigue the readers and not to convince them systematically. Some of these are to be understood as practices, such as auto-theory, creative writing, or essays, while others represent a collaborative writing experiment, and in this sense, an event in themselves. These explicitly creative approaches are complemented by theoretical perspectives that engage with conceptual inquiries involving, among others, Derrida and Deleuze, or explore the notion of the event within cultural products, film, and literature. The volume aligns with contemporary trends in embracing epistemological pluralism within academia, since the book brings together different ways of knowing in order to gain new perspectives on objects, questions and methods, going beyond the strict framework of scientific objectivity. By doing so, this book positions itself as a contribution to a relevant academia, capable of bridging the gap between specialized discourse and the intellectual public sphere.